Renungan....
Jangan Berbangga dengan Calvin Klien & Armani Exchange anda kerana…. Pakaian Terakhir anda adalah Kain Kafan…& perfume anda adalah kapur barus.. '' Jangan Berbangga dengan BMW & Caldina GTfour anda kerana….Kenderaan terakhir anda adalah Keranda yang akan diusung…'' ...Jangan Berbangga dengan Banglo dan Condo anda ...kerana…............................Tempat
Tuesday, November 30, 2010
Monday, November 29, 2010
Adekk Ronaldinho asal dri Malaysia??...
betull kea adik bintang Ac Milan nie from Malaysia..ermm mari kte lihattt-
100 Manusia yg pling berpengaruhh d dunia...
1 Muhammad
2 Isaac Newton
3 Jesus Christ
4 Buddha
5 Confucius
6 St. Paul
7 Ts'ai Lun
8 Johann Gutenberg
9 Christopher Columbus
10 Albert Einstein
11 Louis Pasteur
12 Galileo Galilei
13 Aristotle
14 Euclid
15 Moses
16 Charles Darwin
17 Shih Huang Ti
18 Augustus Caesar
19 Nicolaus Copernicus
20 Antoine Laurent Lavoisier
21 Constantine the Great
22 James Watt
23 Michael Faraday
24 James Clerk Maxwell
25 Martin Luther
26 George Washington
27 Karl Marx
28 Orville and Wilbur Wright
29 Genghis Khan
30 Adam Smith
31 Edward de Vere a.k.a. William Shakespeare
32 John Dalton
33 Alexander the Great
34 Napoleon Bonaparte
35 Thomas Edison
36 Antony van Leeuwenhoek
37 William T.G. Morton
38 Guglielmo Marconi
39 Adolf Hitler
40 Plato
41 Oliver Cromwell
42 Alexander Graham Bell
43 Alexander Fleming
44 John Locke
45 Ludwig van Beethoven
46 Werner Heisenberg
47 Louis Daguerre
48 Simon Bolivar
49 Rene Descartes
50 Michelangelo
51 Pope Urban II
52 'Umar ibn al-Khattab
53 Asoka
54 St. Augustine
55 William Harvey
56 Ernest Rutherford
57 John Calvin
58 Gregor Mendel
59 Max Planck
60 Joseph Lister
61 Nikolaus August Otto
62 Francisco Pizarro
63 Hernando Cortes
64 Thomas Jefferson
65 Queen Isabella I
66 Joseph Stalin
67 Julius Caesar
68 William the Conqueror
69 Sigmund Freud
70 Edward Jenner
71 Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen
72 Johann Sebastian Bach
73 Lao Tzu
74 Voltaire
75 Johannes Kepler Lutheran
76 Enrico Fermi
77 Leonhard Euler
78 Jean-Jacques Rousseau
79 Nicoli Machiavelli
80 Thomas Malthus
81 John F. Kennedy
82 Gregory Pincus
83 Mani
84 Lenin
85 Sui Wen Ti
86 Vasco da Gama
87 Cyrus the Great
88 Peter the Great
89 Mao Zedong
90 Francis Bacon
91 Henry Ford
92 Mencius
93 Zoroaster
94 Queen Elizabeth I
95 Mikhail Gorbachev
96 Menes
97 Charlemagne
98 Homer
99 Justinian I
100 Mahavira
Sunday, November 28, 2010
Lima tahun slepas TSUNAMI...
Semasa Tsunami melanda...
Selepas kejadian Tsunami...
Semasa Tsunami melanda...
Selepas Kejadian Tsunami....
Semasa Tsunami melanda...
Di tmpat yg sama selepas Tsunami
Semasa kejadian itu melanda...
Akhirnyaa begini.....
Semasa Tsunami melanda....
Dengan rahmat ALLAH...
Subhanallahh....
Allhamdullilah.....
Knapa gurlz skew ambil gmba mcm nie ea??
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Top 10 Countries Without Military Forces
As said by famous French statesman George Clemenceau, “War is much too serious a matter to be entrusted to the military,” and even today, his statement still stands true. While most countries have large military forces that are able to deploy and protect at any given time (the largest and most notable being China, at about 1,600,000 army personnel), some countries have no military at all.
Below is a list of ten countries that have no set military forces, each of them with varying reasons why; some because of the country’s history other because of its location. While many people believe that a military force is a necessity, there are countries that see or have no need for them; however, in many cases, there is a back-up plan in the case that the country is attacked or war is declared upon that country.
10. Solomon Islands
The Solomon Islands, surprisingly, is not made up of just a few islands, but totals ranging in the thousands. Ever since the U.K. became the country’s protectorate in 1893, the country hasn’t had much of a military defense. During WWII the country did have the British Solomon Islands Protectorate Defense Force. Then, in 1976 the Solomon Islands were able to establish a government that was stable up until about 1998. During 1998-2006, the country was plagued with misconduct within the government, crime, and ethnic conflict. To properly resolve these issues, New Zealand and Australia both stepped in to restore peace and eventually disarm. Today the country internally has the Solomon Islands Police Force.
So who’s the protector?
There is no set protector of the Solomon Islands; however, the country had paid Australia for certain defense items. If a war were to ever be declared upon the islands, Australia would probably be one of the first countries to provide a defense. (Image: “Captain Warren Frederick Martin Clemens, British Solomon Islands Protectorate Defense Force (BSIPDF), with six members of the BSIPDF Scouts,” www.leatherneck.com.)
9. Costa Rica
Though the country did once have an army, today, Costa Rica stands as one of many countries without a formal standing army. On December 1, 1948, José Figueres Ferrer, president at the time, signed legislation that would abolish the military after the fatal Costa Rican civil war that killed almost 2,000 people. To properly represent this abolishment, the president himself was able to break a wall of the Cuartel Bellavista, which was once an army headquarters location. Today the country has the Fuerza Pública which provides law enforcement, ground security, border patrol, and many other common duties held by a police force.
So who’s the protector?
Thanks to the Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance of 1947, if any country were to ever attack or declare war upon Costa Rica, the country can depend on 21 other countries, including the U.S., Chile, and Cuba to provide some sort of military force to provide defense. The treaty stands that if any of the signed countries were attacked, those other countries would be looked upon to help provide some sort of military defense.
8. Samoa
Today, Samoa has no set military force that could be used if ever necessary. Instead, the country would have to rely on outside friendships with other countries to find protection and defense in wartime. The country does have a Samoa Police Force, but of course, this is definitely not considered to be a military force for the entire country.
So who’s the protector?
Samoa has a friendship treaty with New Zealand, made in 1962. In the event of a war or other foreign invasion, Samoa can call upon New Zealand for any sort of necessary military aid. However the agreement does state that either country can pull out of the treaty at any time if wanted.
7. Palau
Despite the lack of a national military force, Palau does have a Palau National Police section that was created to provide the necessary protection for civilians. Like most police forces, the Palau National Police force is needed to keep the peace and attend to any internal unrest that may occur. If war were to ever arise, Palau would have to reach out for help from other countries to provide some sort of defense system.
So who’s the protector?
Standing as an associated state, Palau will be protected by the U.S. in the event that the country is attacked or if another country decides that war with Palau is a must. This is because of the Compact of Free Association of 1983 that basically made the U.S. the protectorate of Palau.
6. Andorra
Despite not ever having a true organized military, the tiny country of Andorra was bold enough to declare war on Germany in 1914 and join the so called Great War. With a 10-man strong army, the country did not do much and was not taken seriously. Even though the country did officially pick sides, Andorra was not invited to the Versailles Peace Treaty negotiations. In 1931 the group of men roughly called an army was replaced by the Andorran National Police. This group, made up of about 240 men, was created to help keep the peace and is even trained to provide hostage rescue. Joining the police force is a must if you’re a man who owns a firearm.
So who’s the protector?
Andorra has not one, not two, but three protectors. France and Spain have both pledged to be the militaristic protectors of the 181 sq mi. country because of its location (landlocked). In fact in 1933, France militaristic force was needed to help settle civil unrest in the country. Besides these two countries, NATO forces would also take part in protecting the country if ever necessary.
5. Grenada
Ever since the American-led invasion of Grenada, the country has not been able to establish a standing army. The invasion was mostly started because of a military coup and a power struggle within the government that led to the execution of the Grenadian Prime Minister, Maurice Bishop. Because of this invasion which successfully turned a communist state back into a democratic nation, the country does not have a standing army, but relies on the Royal Grenada Police Force as well as the Regional Security System.
So who’s the protector?
There is no set country that is set out to protect Grenada with a military force. Because of the Regional Security System, the country can look to Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Dominica, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines for some sort of military support; however, most of these countries do not have a big enough defense system to be of great assistance. It seems that inevitably the U.S. would run to the rescue.
4. Marshall Islands
Under the Compact of Free Association of 1983, the Marshall Islands was granted the status of a sovereign nation. Also involved in the pact is the Federated States of Micronesia and Palau. Under this agreement, the three countries would be free, but would stand as associated states to the U.S. This means that the U.S. will serve as the protectorate and that the Marshall Islands would have no regular military force, or any sort of responsibility for the country’s defense during wartime. The country created the Marshall Islands Police to carry out common police duties within the country.
So who’s the protector?
Since the Marshall Islands are considered to be an associated state to the U.S., the U.S. is fully responsible for the country’s defense and security. If the islands were ever attacked, the U.S. would have to provide the necessary military support to assist in the war.
3. Liechtenstein
Like a few others on the list, Liechtenstein is another country that decided to completely abolish its standing army. Liechtenstein got rid of its army in 1868 after the Austro-Prussian War because it was said to be too expensive for the country to afford. After the country was freed from the German Confederation, it was obligated to maintain its own army, but the funding just wasn’t available. However, to keep peace within the country, there is a police force known as the Principality of Liechtenstein National Police.
So who’s the protector?
There is no set country that would have to defend Liechtenstein in the event of a war or some other sort of attack. It is said that the country is allowed to rally up an army in the case of a war, but this army would probably be futile and help from Switzerland just might come. There have been talks of Switzerland being responsible for Liechtenstein’s defense, but neither country have proven or denied this claim.
2. Nauru
Nauru, known as the smallest island country in the world at just 8.1 sq miles is definitely unique in many ways, though like plenty others on the list, has no set standing army or any other type of military force. The country, possibly due to its size, doesn’t even have a capital. Though extremely small, the country does have a Nauru Police Force that is utilized to ensure that the country is able to maintain stability. Located in a group of thousands of small islands called Micronesia, the country is heavily relied upon for its readily accessible phosphate. Today the country keeps close contact with nearby Australia and other Micronesia islands.
So who’s the protector?
It is said that through an informal agreement made between Nauru and Australia that Australia would supply militaristic needs or basic country defense. In fact, in December 1940 when Germany attacked Nauru, the Australian Navy was called upon to defend the country as necessary.
1. Vatican City
Named the smallest country in the world, Vatican City, unsurprisingly, is a country that does not have a de jure military; however, this hasn’t always been the case. In the past, there were numerous militaristic groups that were created to protect the country and most importantly the Pope. Notably the Noble Guard and the Palatine Guard did exist, but Pope Paul VI abolished both groups in 1970. Today, Vatican City’s best example of a militaristic force would be the Pontifical Swiss Guard. This group is meant to protect the Pope as well as the Palace of the Vatican. There is also theGendarmerie Corps, but this group is considered to be a civilian force rather than military. They are responsible for keeping public order, traffic control, border control, and investigating criminal activity.
Pengakuan penyanyi Fiq tentang tabiat merokoknya mungkin kedengaran pelik tetapi anak jati Sabah itu percaya tabiat tersebut banyak membantu dalam memantapkan lagi vokalnya.
Ujar juara program realiti Mentor musim pertama itu dalam satu pertemuan bersama mStar Online baru-baru ini, sejak mula merokok setahun yang lalu dia dapat melihat kesan positif tabiat itu pada perubahan vokalnya.
"Saya baru saja merokok. Sebelum bergelar penyanyi saya tidak merokok dan tabiat ini bermula apabila saya selalu berasa bosan ketika menunggu waktu untuk rakaman lagu dan pertunjukkan.
"Bagaimanapun tabiat ini berlaku bukan kerana saya mengalami kejutan budaya atau terikut-ikut orang lain. Ia kehendak diri sendiri.
"Sejak mula merokok setahun yang lalu, saya mula mendapati tabiat ini sebenarnya banyak memberikan kesan positif pada suara saya," katanya.
Sambil tidak menyangkal tabiat itu tidak baik untuk kesihatan, Fiq bagaimanapun menganggap tabiat tersebut banyak membantunya dalam memantapkan vokal sebagai penyanyi rock.
"Saya tahu tabiat merokok membahayakan kesihatan tetapi sejak mula merokok saya dapati ia banyak membantu dalam memantapkan vokal. Vokal saya bertambah kasar, besar dan serak berbanding sebelum merokok dulu....
Banyak kisah fasal artis ini yang boleh diketengahkan oleh wartawan/akhbar, namun mengapa mereka mahu menulis dan menyiarkan berita seumpama ini? Mengapa tidak diketengahkan cerita artis ini berbuat amal soleh, sembahyang secara berjemaah di masjid, atau kisah artis ini terlibat dalam aktiviti sosial yang mendatangkan faedah?
Apabila cerita seumpama ini disiarkan, maka impaknya sudah tentu cukup besar kepada remaja. Hal ini demikian kerana artis sering (walaupun tidak sepatutnya) diangkat/dianggap sebagai suri teladan. Justeru, apa-apa yang dibuat oleh seseorang artis akan mudah ditiru oleh remaja. Paling mudah peminat akan meniru artis mereka dari segi cara berpakaian dan tingkah laku.
Hari ini artis yang lahir daripada sebuah program realiti TV seperti yang diberitakan oleh Mstar telah mengeluarkan kenyataan yang amat tidak bertanggungjawab kepada pembangunan sahsiah remaja. Walaupun menyedari bahaya rokok kepada kesihatan, namun artis ini dengan "bangga" mengatakan bahawa merokok membuatkan vokalnya bertambah mantap dan memberikan kesan positif kepada suaranya.
Kenyataan dan artikel tersebut tidak sewajarnya disiarkan kerana impaknya cukup besar kepada pembaca yang begitu taksub dengan tingkah laku artis pujaan mereka.
Saturday, November 27, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
